The study guides state:

"The use of non-programmable calculators is
permitted during the test. Scratch paper for
computations should be provided."[/quote]

I've contacted several military test centers which stated just that.
I won't be sweating it as my calculator does not have that program option.

In an effort to add more speculation with some possibly, potentially helpful information, here's an excerpt from the University of Alberta Engineering Department which provides some detail, at least from their perspective, of programmable vs. non-programmable calculators. This whole four function thing in previous posts sounds crazy to me. Why DSST doesn't make this clear is beyond me. Anyway, for those who are interested, check this out.


Policy on Calculator Use In Examination
List of Approved Calculators

Approved Calculators: Functionality and Specifications

Policy on Calculator Use In Examinations

The Faculty of Engineering has adopted a policy for undergraduate courses whereby only certain makes and models of calculators are allowed in midterm and final examinations for all undergraduate courses offered within the Faculty. This is to provide a level playing field for all students and preclude devices with communications capabilities.

Any calculator taken into an examination must have a sticker identifying it as an acceptable programmable (green sticker) or non-programmable calculator (gold sticker). Students can purchase calculators at the University Book Store with stickers already affixed. Calculators purchased elsewhere can be brought to the Dean's Office where the appropriate sticker will be affixed to the calculator.

Given the cost of the programmable calculators, instructors should give careful consideration to the need for these in an examination...

List of Approved Calculators
Calculators approved by the Faculty of Engineering for use in examinations are as follows:

Non-Programmable:
Hewlett Packard Model HP 30S
Sharp EL-520V or EL-520VB
CASIO FX-115MS Plus
Texas Instruments Model TI-30X IIB or TI-30X IIS (The IIS is the solar version of the IIB and costs ~$5 more)
(All Approximately $20)

Programmable:
Acceptable: Texas Instruments Models below: (Approx. $175)

TI-83 Plus
TI-73
TI-80
TI-82
TI-83
Recommended: Texas Instruments Models TI-83 Plus & higher

TI-83 Plus
T1-83 Plus Silver Edition
TI-84 Plus
TI-84 Plus Silver Edition
TI-85
TI-86
TI-89
T1-89 Titanium
TI-92 Plus

__________________
Michael

CLEP - ISCA 68, Sociology 72, Psych 73, A&I Lit 61, HG&D 65, Ed Psych 70, Marketing 72, Management 69, Macroeconomics 63, Microeconomics 67
DSST - Intro to Comp 66, MIS 61, Supervision 67, Counseling 58 - no study!, Personal Finance 67, Statistics 60, Criminal Justice 57, Ethics 58, Finance 63 (All A's at EC)
COC - 2007 (Community College) - Acctg I&II 10c, Work/Study 4c, Intro to Research (Info Lit req) 1c, Society and Rock & Roll 3c, Fund of Music 3c, Guitar I & II - 4c, Bass Guitar I - 2c
ECE - Ethics (A), HRM (B), Organizational Behavior (B) | CSU - Operations Mgmt. (A) | TECEP - Business Policy 80 (CR)

My Excelsior Degree Journey

Bachelor of Science in General Business, cum laude
Excelsior College

My exam proctor has informed me that I may use a calculator but they provide the calculator. I have informed the testing center, under DSST guidelines, I am allowed to bring my own.

But if not able to do so, the exam proctor needs to inform me what calculator I will be using. I can not show up the day of the exam and then figure out how to use the calculator!!

It's an issue if the proctor refuses to let you use said calculator, or cancels the test results on account of calculator usage. Apparently the testing centers are being told by DSST that only 4-function calculators are acceptable for use, so said testing center are quite likely to decide that whatever calculator you bring in (it would likely have to be older than you are), it's not acceptable.

__________________
Excelsior, BS Finance, pursuing degree

Studying:

Completed:
CLEP: Hum. (67), Hist. of U.S. I (74), Hist. of U.S. II (71), Intro. Psych. (69), Intro. Soc. (72), Soc. Sci. and Hist. (74), Western Civ I (72), Western Civ II (70), Am. Lit. (60), Intro. to Educ. Psych. (62), P. of Management (74), P. of Market. (74), Intro. Bus. Law (67), P. of Accounting (60), AmGov (68)
DSST: Ethics in Am. (76), P. of Super.(67), HRM (65), Intro to Bus. (70), MIS (65), P. of Fin (62), M&B (65), P. of Stat. (68)
ECE: OB (B)
TECEP:: IntFin, SecAna

Total Credits: 114

Sent 7/5/2007:

'(Please find below my reasoned assessment of the calculator guidelines
given by the DSST program, and the rationales given for the conclusions
reached. See attached PDF, page 13 actual, for a copy of the calculator
guidelines.)

It does not logically stand to reason that only 4-function calculators
are acceptable for DSST exams. First, if this was the case, the
guidelines for acceptable calculators would be excessively redundant.
It would serve no purpose to state that a calculator does not have a
full alphabetic display, indicating partial alphabetic displays are
acceptable. It would not need to be noted that the calculator should be
nonprogrammable, and lacking a graphical display. No 4-function
calculator would have any alphabetical display to begin with, and the
issue of programmability or a graphical display would be a moot point.
The guidelines, if meant to restrict calculators to 4-function only,
would only need to say "only a calculator with addition, subtraction,
division and multiplication is acceptable." Secondly, four-function
calculators are vestiges of the 1970s. It would not be reasonable for a
2006 publication to restrict students to calculators decades old, in
short supply and at relatively expensive prices.

Examining the guidelines, the last three criteria of "nonprogrammable"
with no "full alphabetical display" or "graphical display," I believe
this indicates an imprecise attempt at banning full-fledged computers
from the test room. As the DSST staff appear unaware of and unable to
comment on the existing guidelines, I have made a good faith effort to
properly and correctly apply them to the Casio FX-115ES, which I believe
is acceptable under the calculator guidelines as written.

1) "any commercially produced calculator" - the Casio FX-115ES ("the
calculator") is commercially produced by Casio
2) "that is battery or solar operated" - the calculator is solar
operated
3) "silent" - the calculator has no speaker
4) "handheld" - the calculator is a handheld device
5) "nonprogrammable" - the calculator does not have any Boolean logic,
high-level programming languages such as TI-BASIC. I have interpreted
the guideline as pertaining to high-level programming languages only, as
programmability is a wide ranging phenomenon, including direct
interaction with the calculator, and feature such as M+ and M-. As
either of these would ban all calculators, they cannot be the case, or
else there would be no point in creating calculator guidelines.
6) "does not have either a full alphabetic display or a graphical
display" - the calculator does not have a full alphabetical display.
Again, any viewable display is technically graphical in nature.
However, this would also have the effect of banning all calculators,
with the same conclusion as point 5. Therefore, I have interpreted
"graphical display" to mean a display with individual pixel addressing,
such as a graphing calculator, a PDA, or laptop computer. The
calculator does not have a display with individually addressed pixels.

Now, a counter-example, using the Casio CFX-9850GCPlus, a calculator
that I believe would violate said guidelines:

5) "nonprogrammable" - this calculator has 64KB of memory. It can store
user generated programs, programmed in its own proprietary Boolean
logic-based high-level programming language.
6) "does not have either a full alphabetic display or a graphical
display" - the display on the calculator is listed as being "21
characters x 8 lines." This indicates a fully alphabetical and
graphically capable display.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.'

Received 7/6/2007:

"I'll check into this further."

__________________
Excelsior, BS Finance, pursuing degree

Studying:

Completed:
CLEP: Hum. (67), Hist. of U.S. I (74), Hist. of U.S. II (71), Intro. Psych. (69), Intro. Soc. (72), Soc. Sci. and Hist. (74), Western Civ I (72), Western Civ II (70), Am. Lit. (60), Intro. to Educ. Psych. (62), P. of Management (74), P. of Market. (74), Intro. Bus. Law (67), P. of Accounting (60), AmGov (68)
DSST: Ethics in Am. (76), P. of Super.(67), HRM (65), Intro to Bus. (70), MIS (65), P. of Fin (62), M&B (65), P. of Stat. (68)
ECE: OB (B)
TECEP:: IntFin, SecAna

Total Credits: 114

Man oh Man! I'm getting my Finance exam over with before you guys get every testing issued it's own dollar store calculator... Has no one heard the addage don't ask, don't tell? Turn this mole into a mountain and everyone will pay the price. Different testing centers will have different issues. Work the issues out with the testing center. If possible find a different testing center. As far as I can see the only grey area right now is whether or not you can have a calculator in the room during an online exam. There the precedent set by CLEP is pretty clear. Only the online calculator is available for use. On the other hand the test info sheet clearly states that you can take a calculator to the exam. This is where things get murky. OK if you limit the online version to only the online calc then people taking the paper exam using their own calculator (the same one I had to buy my 7th grader by the way) do have an advantage if the questions are exactly the same.

I've got one math intensive test left. It's now my first priority before someone gets their lawyer involved.

__________________
Dale H.
half way...
Enrolled - BS-BGB Excelsior
Completed - 65 credits
Togo - 4 CLEP, 6 DSST, 2 ECE, 1 EC Course, 1 TECEP

I don't think not asking is an option. Others, including myself, have run into testing centers that believe no calculators are allowed at all. If you don't ask, and you don't find out until you show up at the testing center, it's likely you'll either take the test sans calculator and fail, or be discovered during the test using a calculator, and then have to fight against a score cancellation due to perceived testing irregularities. These are real problems and concerns, and you can't just sweep them under the rug and hope that your testing center is one of the more lenient ones.

__________________
Excelsior, BS Finance, pursuing degree

Studying:

Completed:
CLEP: Hum. (67), Hist. of U.S. I (74), Hist. of U.S. II (71), Intro. Psych. (69), Intro. Soc. (72), Soc. Sci. and Hist. (74), Western Civ I (72), Western Civ II (70), Am. Lit. (60), Intro. to Educ. Psych. (62), P. of Management (74), P. of Market. (74), Intro. Bus. Law (67), P. of Accounting (60), AmGov (68)
DSST: Ethics in Am. (76), P. of Super.(67), HRM (65), Intro to Bus. (70), MIS (65), P. of Fin (62), M&B (65), P. of Stat. (68)
ECE: OB (B)
TECEP:: IntFin, SecAna

Total Credits: 114

I'm completely on board with you on this concept--but not in this case! I applaud those who are pursuing this aggressively, as it can only help all of us one way or the other. To me--the intent is clear. Why they refuse to spell it out is not clear. Their calculator guidelines, as written, are consistent with SAT, AP etc. guidelines. The testing center interpretations are clearly wrong and given by disinterested parties who are simply playing it safe because they are lazy and/or ... not the sharpest knives in the drawer. I, for one, want to know and have something to back me up before I set foot in the testing center--or even raise the issue.

__________________
Michael

CLEP - ISCA 68, Sociology 72, Psych 73, A&I Lit 61, HG&D 65, Ed Psych 70, Marketing 72, Management 69, Macroeconomics 63, Microeconomics 67
DSST - Intro to Comp 66, MIS 61, Supervision 67, Counseling 58 - no study!, Personal Finance 67, Statistics 60, Criminal Justice 57, Ethics 58, Finance 63 (All A's at EC)
COC - 2007 (Community College) - Acctg I&II 10c, Work/Study 4c, Intro to Research (Info Lit req) 1c, Society and Rock & Roll 3c, Fund of Music 3c, Guitar I & II - 4c, Bass Guitar I - 2c
ECE - Ethics (A), HRM (B), Organizational Behavior (B) | CSU - Operations Mgmt. (A) | TECEP - Business Policy 80 (CR)

My Excelsior Degree Journey

Bachelor of Science in General Business, cum laude
Excelsior College

On 7/10/2007, I received this in response:

"We are going to have 4-function calculators available for the DSST exams
that allow calculators."

I think this means that they are only allowing their own "4-function" calculators at the exam, and will not allow outside, more advanced calculators, in contravention to the implied standards of the calculator guidelines in the candidate bulletin. Therefore, I have decided to seek out alternative DSST testing centers for exams requiring the use of a calculator.

As a reference for anyone in the area, the testing center in question is Northern Essex Community College in Haverhill, MA.

Edit:

I have sent the following e-mail (same date) to an alternate DSST testing center in my area. I will post the reply when it arrives:

'Within the next few months, I intend to take the DSST exams "Principles of Finance" and "Principles of Statistics." To prevent any confusion from occurring while taking the
exams, I will be bringing in my own calculators to the exams, as according to the DSST Candidate Bulletin (see attached PDF file, actual page 13), both the "Principles of Finance" and "Principles of Statistics" exams allow calculators to be used.
I will be bringing in calculators that I understand fall under the following DSST issued guidelines for acceptable calculators: "An approved calculator is any commercially produced calculator that is battery or solar operated, silent, handheld, nonprogrammable and does not have either a full alphabetic display or a graphical display." It is quite probable that you are fully aware of the above, but another testing center I contacted was wholly unaware that any calculators were allowed on any exams, and I've read reports of other testing centers issuing their own calculator guidelines, in contravention to the published DSST calculator guidelines. Thank you.'

__________________
Excelsior, BS Finance, pursuing degree

Studying:

Completed:
CLEP: Hum. (67), Hist. of U.S. I (74), Hist. of U.S. II (71), Intro. Psych. (69), Intro. Soc. (72), Soc. Sci. and Hist. (74), Western Civ I (72), Western Civ II (70), Am. Lit. (60), Intro. to Educ. Psych. (62), P. of Management (74), P. of Market. (74), Intro. Bus. Law (67), P. of Accounting (60), AmGov (68)
DSST: Ethics in Am. (76), P. of Super.(67), HRM (65), Intro to Bus. (70), MIS (65), P. of Fin (62), M&B (65), P. of Stat. (68)
ECE: OB (B)
TECEP:: IntFin, SecAna

Total Credits: 114

7/10/2007, received this from Granite State College-Manchester (GSC) in reply to the above:

"Sounds good to me."

Therefore, if you are in the Boston-Manchester metro area, I would recommend going to GSC for DSST exams that allow calculators.

__________________
Excelsior, BS Finance, pursuing degree

Studying:

Completed:
CLEP: Hum. (67), Hist. of U.S. I (74), Hist. of U.S. II (71), Intro. Psych. (69), Intro. Soc. (72), Soc. Sci. and Hist. (74), Western Civ I (72), Western Civ II (70), Am. Lit. (60), Intro. to Educ. Psych. (62), P. of Management (74), P. of Market. (74), Intro. Bus. Law (67), P. of Accounting (60), AmGov (68)
DSST: Ethics in Am. (76), P. of Super.(67), HRM (65), Intro to Bus. (70), MIS (65), P. of Fin (62), M&B (65), P. of Stat. (68)
ECE: OB (B)
TECEP:: IntFin, SecAna

Total Credits: 114