OPM-411 TQM (Total Quality Management) Review - Printable Version +- Online Degrees and CLEP and DSST Exam Prep Discussion (https://www.degreeforum.net/mybb) +-- Forum: Specific College Discussion (https://www.degreeforum.net/mybb/Forum-Specific-College-Discussion) +--- Forum: TESU - Thomas Edison State University Discussion (https://www.degreeforum.net/mybb/Forum-TESU-Thomas-Edison-State-University-Discussion) +--- Thread: OPM-411 TQM (Total Quality Management) Review (/Thread-OPM-411-TQM-Total-Quality-Management-Review) |
OPM-411 TQM (Total Quality Management) Review - Flelm - 12-02-2020 I don't see a lot of discussion on this course, and I just wanted to post my impressions in case it helps anyone else in the future. I took it in the March 2020 term. OPM-411 is required for the BSBA Operations Management. I'm not certain if at this point there's a more economical way to get the requirement, possibly CSU-Global's Project Quality Management PJM440S self-study assessment? In any case, this course was interesting because I was the only student enrolled in the course. I would say the workload is not quite as much as a capstone.
The most difficult was the PowerPoint and final project because there was quite a bit of 'making stuff up.' The scenario was very vague and you need to get creative. It's about a one-paragraph scenario, and you need to determine almost everything: the company's business model, the challenges it's facing, it's quality failure modes, etc. I didn't reach out for help on this and instead struggled through it myself, and had to keep telling myself 'it's good enough.' If I had reached out, maybe I would've had an easier time. Once I settled on the scenario and the details, the discussion notes for the PowerPoint became the hardest part. I did the PowerPoint first, and went back and put in 'notes' but what I think was really required was a full paper essentially, inside the PowerPoint notes section. I got through this by the skin of my teeth, and I received a 93 overall for the course, barely giving me an A. OPM-411 TQM (Total Quality Management) Review - ROYISAGIRL - 12-02-2020 Thank you for posting this. I do enjoy when people post about courses that aren't the norm. I have always wondered what would a person do if they are the only student in a courses. Sent from my SM-G981V using DegreeForum.net mobile app RE: OPM-411 TQM (Total Quality Management) Review - Flelm - 12-02-2020 It was really weird. I'm not sure why they didn't cancel the course. Maybe because it's a required course for the BSBA OpMgmt AOS? I feel like the professor didn't spend a lot of time on the discussion posts, they seemed mostly prewritten (even his responses to my posts). The assignments were graded fairly however. I didn't do well on the PowerPoint, and my grade reflected that. He did grade me generously on the final paper I believe, to bring me to an A overall. I probably should've earned an A- in the course with the work I did. RE: OPM-411 TQM (Total Quality Management) Review - bjcheung77 - 12-02-2020 That's weird, I wonder why they didn't make the course a Guided Study course instead of an Online course, I guess the posting vs grading extra assignments would have been easier for the teacher. Hmm... it's a first I've seen, most classes would have had at minimum 5 students...I've not been in any course with lesser than that number, ever... RE: OPM-411 TQM (Total Quality Management) Review - dfrecore - 12-02-2020 CSU-Pueblo IS has it for $615/course - MGMT 468: Quality Management RE: OPM-411 TQM (Total Quality Management) Review - ss20ts - 12-02-2020 (12-02-2020, 01:56 PM)Flelm Wrote: It was really weird. I'm not sure why they didn't cancel the course. Maybe because it's a required course for the BSBA OpMgmt AOS? I find that most profs - at a number of schools - just copy and paste their response to the online discussions. It's always funny when they forget to change a name. They don't typically actively participate in the discussions in my experience. I only had one professor who would actually join in which was nice because he could give us his perspective after working in the field for 20+ years. He wasn't a PhD either. He was an adjunct with a master's who still worked his day job which made me feel that was why he actually participated and could give us feedback on different situations and why things were handled a specific way which was helpful. It wasn't just a copy and pasted comment about federal government policies. Reading that would have been less exciting that watching paint dry. |