Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Nationally Accreddited, Regionally Accreddited, and Employment.
#31
(01-27-2021, 10:05 AM)monchevy Wrote:
(01-27-2021, 09:27 AM)eLearner Wrote: Let's not forget that Anabin also had a problem (and still has some reservations) with WGU, a regionally accredited non-profit school, as well as a number of other regionally accredited non-profit schools that here in the U.S. are deemed to be either well-regarded or at least acceptable. Think about this: they have reservations about Western Governors University but never had any about Ashford University, one of the notoriously-known worst schools of all time.

I've learned that somewhere in the world someone will have a problem with your degree almost no matter where you get it from. It's not worth it to get caught up in a million scenarios especially scenarios that are internationally-based unless you plan on living and working outside the USA which most people in the U.S. will never do. Research and go with the reputable school you can afford that offers you what you need and let everyone else go nuts with what-ifs.

(01-27-2021, 09:15 AM)monchevy Wrote: Meanwhile, a relative of mine who's a teacher was told he had to get a master's to get tenure. They didn't care where it was from or what it was in, it just had to be a master's. This was back in the mid-'00s, when the diploma mills were thriving. So he ended up getting it at Ashford, which at the time was, well... PEAK ASHFORD. They didn't care. He got his raise and his tenure, even though the degree wasn't worth the paper it was printed on. And he still lords it over the rest of us that he has a master's.  Dodgy

I wouldn't go quite that far. While Ashford was a terrible school, it was their predatory practices, lying, and overpricing that made them a bad school more than anything else.

At the time, it was indeed a diploma mill. "Lack of academic rigor" was among the reasons they had years of trouble trying to get accredited. The only reason they were accredited at all was because Bridgepoint purchased it as a regionally accredited school, but once it became Ashford, it turned into a diploma mill and couldn't get accredited on its own. And its crappy coursework was one of the reasons.

They were already accredited with the HLC during that entire time and that was in effect from 2005 until 2013 when Ashford resigned it voluntarily after being accepted by WASC that same year. They never lost HLC accreditation and were therefore never unaccredited. I remember the situation pretty well. It went like this: 

Sometime in 2010, Ashford applied to WASC. WASC initially denied them accreditation in 2012 (they were still accredited by the HLC at the time), but after some work Ashford was eventually granted accreditation on its own in 2013 through WASC, then Ashford voluntarily dropped HLC accreditation since it made no sense to carry two regional accreditors. The closest Ashford ever got to actually losing accreditation was when the HLC put them "on notice" in 2013 because it was found that "... the University had not demonstrated that it was substantially present in the North Central region as required by the Commission’s jurisdictional policies":

https://www.hlcommission.org/download/_P...052016.pdf

So while WASC's findings including their "questions about academic rigor" (direct quote from InsideHigherEd) that you mentioned were a bombshell and I have no reason to question the accuracy of WASC's findings, it was part of an initial denial, a very different thing from losing already in-place institutional accreditation which would've been a nuclear ordeal that Ashford almost certainly wouldn't have survived.

As for diploma mills, I've found that the general public defines a "diploma mill" very differently than people in these educational geek circles define it as. In these circles, a diploma mill is normally defined as an outfit that awards degrees with little or no coursework and usually for a small fee: you pay a fee, then 14 or so days later you get a diploma. What you're describing is normally defined as a substandard institution. Every diploma mill is a substandard institution, but not every substandard institution is a diploma mill. We hammered this home so much over the past 20 years that places like Wikipedia and GetEducated have accepted defeat and taken on our definition, lol:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diploma_mi...ted_States

https://www.geteducated.com/college-degr...loma-mill/

Good on them, ours is the right one. There is still some miniscule debate on the term accuracy of "diploma mill" and "degree mill", as a few still want to make distinctions between the two but that debate is all but dead as it's gradually been accepted to mean the same thing.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Nationally Accreddited, Regionally Accreddited, and Employment. - by eLearner - 01-27-2021, 11:33 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)