Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rudisill v. McDonough
#1
Big Grin 

  • The court ruled 7-2 in Rudisill v. McDonough that servicemembers who, through separate periods of service, accrue benefits under both the Post-9/11 Veterans Act and the Montgomery GI Bill, can use either one, in any order, up to a 48-month aggregate cap.

https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/04/annou...-april-16/  Big Grin
Chief Petty Officer
United States Navy (Retired)
Reply
#2
This looks like it will be a good thing for veterans.
Degrees: BA Computer Science, BS Business Administration with a concentration in CIS, AS Natural Science & Math, TESU. 4.0 GPA 2022.
Course Experience:  CLEP, Instantcert, Sophia.org, Study.com, Straighterline.com, Onlinedegree.org, Saylor.org, Csmlearn.com, and TEL Learning.
Certifications: W3Schools PHP, Google IT Support, Google Digital Marketing, Google Project Management
Reply
#3
(04-23-2024, 02:59 PM)LevelUP Wrote: This looks like it will be a good thing for veterans.

It is. Too many times the system is set up so that the answer is NO. This is also a situation where I'm happy with elected officials. Both senators and a congressman supported the veteran in this case.
Chief Petty Officer
United States Navy (Retired)
[-] The following 3 users Like Charles Fout's post:
  • jch, LevelUP, NotJoeBiden
Reply
#4
“Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Alito joined.”

No surprise there.
-
Joe
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)