Please help check over my degree plan for TESU

[jsd]

Not half as much as you, I'm sure.

Your "I know you are but what am I" is a nice touch.

Major errors aren't some side point, now are they? You're basically admitting that you stay on message for your project and derail if the need arises. That's exactly what I've seen.

What I said is that i didn't come into the conversation until my i was mentioned by name and my plan was brought up. And I simply mentioned that my plan will soon have different options available. I guess responding to a mention of my name is now also some paid project?

I'm saying Gen Ed courses aren't some side point, for you to pretend otherwise by minimizing it is exactly why no one should listen to you. You jump into a lot of posts with basically the same posts almost verbatim to stay on a message you know nothing about:

I didn't say it was a side point. I said clearly that other side points often get brought up into a thread. Obviously I was replying to side points that involved me. You were free to reply to what you felt was a more pressing issue, as you do. Of course you had to throw a tantrum about it, and now no one is taking you seriously in the thread, but you could have offered the information in an adult way and no one would have objected.

Again- How would you know?

How would I know that my opinion is that it's easier to pass a course when all of the specific info is given to you in a course shell? You really want to ask me how I know what my own opinion and preference is? Because I am familiar with the setup of both and prefer the setup of one. If others like the other setup more, by all means, use that setup! Stop trying to force people to agree with you.

You didn't attack only David Vise, sneering "convenient" absolutely implied that they were in it together, and that's understood by anyone who reads that thread. You did attack that girl.

The thread is still there, my post hasn't been edited. It was made after the girl's mom called out KayV. If you read it that way, fine, but it's pretty obvious you're intentionally trying to mislead others here.

Check the trash you've written because you've been arguing that from the start. AND you've missed the point, but I'm getting used to your fake obtuseness. I made a contrast between what I do with those online courses and what you do with CLEP, which is talk about it from a position of NO experience.

I've done it from the start, yet you can't point out a single instance. Interesting.

Your kind never does. You've implied every chance you got. And because of the ham-fisted manner that you think is sly, every post mentioning CLEP has post upon post of you going on and on about how CLEP is so [insert negative thing] more than addressing the OP of any given thread that mentions CLEP.

And yet, still not an example. I have not said one negative thing about CLEP.

How would you know?

How do I know that something is more convenient for me, cheaper, and better for my learning style? Because I know how far my nearest testing centers are, I know the cost, and I've looked at how CLEP recommends learning material and how what i prefer has provided learning material. For other people, centers might be closer, cheaper options might not exist for what they need, and their style of learning is likely different than me. So they should go with what they like more. Why would I discourage that? Which is why I never have, as much as you are pretending I have.

When you say:


What studies are you citing?

When I state that it is easier to pass when you don't have to rely on a single exam score and on top of that you get the information directly handed to you, that's opinion. I don't need to conduct or cite a formal study for opinion. This is beyond laughable.

I wrote in the post you are responding to, that baseless reasoning may not be an attack, but it's wrong. No worries, though, I will repeat it as many times as you like. Your baseless reasoning is wrong. Also, I knew you wouldn't be able to answer my question. And you do have something against them. You have a chip on your shoulder for anything that's not an open book test!

"CLEP is a good option that I include in my plans and I also offer other options. I prefer the other options for specific opinions I've stated" is somehow "baseless reasoning" now. Gotcha. Quite a stretch. Keep reaching.

Well, if that's the we you're referring to, then this:



Is flat out wrong. Real inclusion means that it's properly labeled, and the values are represented accurately. Not making a study.com degree plan and slapping the word CLEP as an after thought.

Go ahead and actually read the plan i made that is being referenced. You can see that CLEP is the first option mentioned on the plan, and it's listed as an option everywhere that it seems to fit. You can also look at the edit history the plan, it hasm't been edited in anyway to recently add this info. It's always been in there. Once again, you're flat out lying. You were called out and now have to be dishonest to save face. It isn't working. [/QUOTE]

No, I didn't need to continue because your opinion is uninformed. Like my opinion of the Harvard Extension School, or my opinion on Patten. The only difference is that I don't comment on those schools. You have implied over and over that your baseless opinion is on par with CLEP takers. I hope anyone who would take advice from you is reading and taking note of this!

My opinion of CLEP is that it is a fine option for other people, but I chose a different route. I can only hold the opinion that CLEP might work great for others if I've actually tried it myself? Why would I need to take it to see that other people, like you, like the format?

I checked and about this one thing, you are correct, but you absolutely went after that little girl.

You were proven wrong yet repeat the same lie that was proven wrong because you still have hope this one sticks. I think Jennifer did a great job helping that girl and her mom out, and I'm glad she got some helpful info.

So...Jan 2016

Again, which one of the dozen institutions that I recommend do you specifically think I'm being paid by? I'd like to know where to collect my check.

Wrong! It's because you've been misrepresenting CLEP every chance you got, and I've been very clear on that.

Yet can't point out a specific example, except when you whine that my opinion on other options isn't the same as yours.

You're whiny compulsive need to go after every post that makes even the most casual reference to CLEP.

"CLEP is a good option for many," such vicious attacks I've made on them, sure.

LOL, no just no. What I wrote was in reply to this junk:




It's not up to you decide what's appropriate. Those multiple options are really narrow options tha leave out a lot.

Don't pretend that you didn't understand that "when appropriate" meant "when it works in the situation." For example, I'm not going to recommend a math course if someone is looking strictly for a history course, as that wouldn't be appropriate. You're really, really reaching to make this something it's not.

First off, wanting CLEP to be properly represented is not putting above it all. You're just saying that because you know that when the two are put side by side, many people would naturally choose CLEP, which is why they have all the shrill blathering that are meant to be disclaimers.

Except my plan lists CLEP first, and doesn't even mention my opinions about any other options or give disclaimers. So again, you're making things up.

The reverse doesn't happen as much with using the same script to many posters in a thread. Second if you are taking it upon yourself to determine when to include courses that person may not know about, you are interfering with their education.

Any time I've learned of a new option that I know fits one of my plans, I've added it. I've asked for recommendations for things I've missed. I haven't left out any relevant option that I can track down. You're free to point out what's missing if you know of something I've overlooked.