Ethical caution

[goldpaws]

I absolutely agree with censoring the specific feedback section - it should be done and should have already been done.

While there are "several" versions of the test, and I've retaken quite a few, I (usually) don't find the test or the questions any more difficult or different than the previous (exact) test. Sometimes the retake tests are identical, sometimes they're only partially identical. I won't tell ya which one is EXACT because that's the fun part about retaking tests. :p I have, however, encountered tests where the specific feedback was so specific (to a T) that I could predict almost exactly what was on the test. Too much info? Maybe ..!

Actually, any information posted here in this forum should not be anything more than information found in any test self-help booklet (college board practice tests, kaplan, petersons). Specific mentioning of questions and such can cause a test(s) to be thrown out.

Remember! There are a pile of warnings and agreements BEFORE the test starts. You (as I am) are bound to those by clicking the "OK" button many times over and over. No big disclosures!

I do understand with the "freedom of speech" and "nazi" thing.
However there's a difference between freedom of speech and infringement of a copyrighted test.
And the moderators here are not "nazis" - seriously - I've met nazis. They're creepy. And I've participated on MANY boards of MANY subjects. When I first arrived I actually felt the moderators were not doing much on this board/not very active (or if they were, they hid themselves well behind the scenes!).
I, myself, have moderated before and I'm going to have to encourage a poll on this subject since it seems a split issue. Who wants a poll?! One person, one vote has never failed us (ok, let's not try to dig too deep on trying to disprove that, lol, to the history buffs out there)