ENEB Master Thread

[eLearner]

just to be clear. I have nothing against ENEB, and I'm all in for the degree/ institution.

"I'm not sure why there needs to be a distinction or debate over how to write your degree". Maybe because it's NOT an Iabel degree?! 
"It just seems to me that we are making this more difficult than it needs to be", happens when people deny facts by confirmation bias.

It' amusing to see that even though Isabel says NOT to list it as an Isabel degree, people still insist on listing it as Isabel. We DON'T get both diplomas. The isabel "diploma" only states that they certify the Program of ENEB

"I would personally list it as Isabel I and not ENEB. Isabel I is at least a real university. Listing ENEB would kinda be like getting a Georgia Tech Master's through edX and then listing edX on your resume." it's rather the opposite   . listing edx would be nonsense because the degree (micro, certificate etc.) is from GTM, not edx. 

Let's say Harvard or Tesu suddenly decide to certify the ENEB degree. Does it make a Harvard or Tesu degree? No.
Should you list your Harvard extension degree is Harvard only? No
Listing Isabel would be similar to listing Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities instead of your WGU degree. 

let's assume I wrote on my Linkedin MBA from AACSB university.  "no one has ever asked, inquired, questioned, or in any way posed a concern over "how I list my credentials". I guess by your logic I can continue to list it that way??

Isabel, in this scenario, is considered similar to an accreditation organization. Just because Isabel is also a University doesn't make it an Isabel degree. 

Why diminish the ENEB degree by listing Isabel? Don't be ashamed of ENEB!

This is a tough one because there has been information from ENEB and Isabel itself saying it was okay for students to use only Isabel on their resumes because Isabel has it own degree issued and maintains the student database at their own website.

Technically, in all situations even in the United States, the main University always certifies the program of its connected/affiliated colleges, so no difference there, just in the Spain situation they put it in writing. Different culture, different way of going about things. Some Spanish Universities do this with propios even when they issue the diplomas and transcripts themselves only (San Jorge does this). 

In Spain, because of the way its system is set up to include propios not issued by Universities, they tend to treat their propio teaching schools in the same way.

With propio programs themselves (ones not taught by the Universities), as I understand it, the Universities either develop the programs or approve the programs developed by the teaching school. In both situations, the University is positioned as the "accreditor", and the term "accreditor/accreditation" is often used in these arrangements which confuses people in the United States because that arrangement is not what we here would classify as accreditation.

Some people write Isabel as the main University and mention ENEB as the teaching school. Some only write Isabel, some only write ENEB. From the information I've read (information that has come from both entities), neither entity seems to care. To us this is a big deal, but Spain has a different culture and what we make a big deal about may be insignificant to Spaniards. But, if either school is saying something different now, then things may have changed since the time I read the info I mentioned.