02-03-2026, 06:34 AM
"If we pull up a higher resolution version of the consulate letter, there is something amiss. We can see digital artifacts from lossy compression around the seal in the corner, the header, the date, and the footer region. Yet, there are none around the body text. Why is everything except for the body text showing digital artifacts?
Is it fake? Nah, he wouldn't fake it, would he?"
Then explain one thing to me: if that degree is fake, why would someone publicly display a forged document?
If it is indeed forged, proving it would be straightforward: one would simply need to contact the relevant authorities.
The fact that "Lucarelli", "Post" or whoever else said they thought it was fake doesn't mean a thing. And more importantly, who are these people?
But the funniest part is that you're saying, basically, all these important documents (including the one from MIT) are fake, while the only real one would be from the Universal Life Church So we're back to the same point: the University of the People hires people who have degrees from the Universal Life Church.
Is it fake? Nah, he wouldn't fake it, would he?"
Then explain one thing to me: if that degree is fake, why would someone publicly display a forged document?
If it is indeed forged, proving it would be straightforward: one would simply need to contact the relevant authorities.
The fact that "Lucarelli", "Post" or whoever else said they thought it was fake doesn't mean a thing. And more importantly, who are these people?
But the funniest part is that you're saying, basically, all these important documents (including the one from MIT) are fake, while the only real one would be from the Universal Life Church
So we're back to the same point: the University of the People hires people who have degrees from the Universal Life Church.
![[-]](https://www.degreeforum.net/mybb/images/collapse.png)
