Posts: 3,670
Threads: 323
Likes Received: 2,047 in 1,343 posts
Likes Given: 1,137
Joined: Jun 2018
Should you need a vaccination card in order to vote?
Degrees: BA Computer Science, BS Business Administration with a concentration in CIS, AS Natural Science & Math, TESU. 4.0 GPA 2022.
Course Experience: CLEP, Instantcert, Sophia.org, Study.com, Straighterline.com, Onlinedegree.org, Saylor.org, Csmlearn.com, and TEL Learning.
Certifications: W3Schools PHP, Google IT Support, Google Digital Marketing, Google Project Management
![[-]](https://www.degreeforum.net/mybb/images/collapse.png)
•
Posts: 763
Threads: 30
Likes Received: 305 in 212 posts
Likes Given: 318
Joined: Aug 2018
(08-02-2021, 03:37 AM)LevelUP Wrote: Should you need a vaccination card in order to vote? No. Because not everyone can get it. This would exclude people who for no fault of their own can't be vaccinated.
In Progress: CSU MS Occupational Safety | TESU BALS HR & Computer Science | TESU AAS Admin Studies
Universidad Isabel I: ENEB MBA, HRM
Completed: TESU AAS Environmental, Safety & Tech, BA in Environmental Studies/ Natural Science and Mathematics
Posts: 1,329
Threads: 69
Likes Received: 629 in 386 posts
Likes Given: 1,273
Joined: Apr 2021
One has nothing to do with the other.
MBA, starting July 2022
BA, Sociology
Certificate, Paralegal Studies
Certificate, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in the Workplace
Certificate, Global Entrepreneurship & Innovation Virtual Bootcamp - (Thunderbird)
Sophia: 17 credits
LawShelf affiliate (NCCRS credits)
Buy one, get one free with my affiliate code: VK375
https://lawshelf.com/videocoursesview
Posts: 16,325
Threads: 148
Likes Received: 5,478 in 3,748 posts
Likes Given: 367
Joined: Apr 2013
Why would you? I voted last year, we social distanced (and masked).
Considering how many Black and Hispanic people won't get vaccinations, who is going to propose that rule? The Republicans wouldn't anyway, and Dems know that would look racist.
TESU BSBA/HR 2018 - WVNCC BOG AAS 2017 - GGU Cert in Mgmt 2000
EXAMS: TECEP Tech Wrtg, Comp II, LA Math, PR, Computers DSST Computers, Pers Fin CLEP Mgmt, Mktg
COURSES: TESU Capstone Study.com Pers Fin, Microecon, Stats Ed4Credit Acct 2 PF Fin Mgmt ALEKS Int & Coll Alg Sophia Proj Mgmt The Institutes - Ins Ethics Kaplan PLA
Posts: 1,340
Threads: 388
Likes Received: 493 in 343 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2021
People have the right to vote and they have the right to refuse medical treatment. Eliminating either one of these would create far more problems than it would solve. But how about this...since we know that the vaccine eliminates costly medical treatment for people who become infected with covid, and since the vaccine is available to anyone who wants it, why should the insurance company pay for someone's medical treatment if they refuse the vaccine and then become infected. It's a preventable illness and so what if the insurance companies refused to pay? People would still get the treatment, they'd just have to pay for it themselves. Can you imagine that happening? It's simply the logical consequence of their own behavior.
•
Posts: 16,325
Threads: 148
Likes Received: 5,478 in 3,748 posts
Likes Given: 367
Joined: Apr 2013
(08-03-2021, 01:34 PM)Alpha Wrote: People have the right to vote and they have the right to refuse medical treatment. Eliminating either one of these would create far more problems than it would solve. But how about this...since we know that the vaccine eliminates costly medical treatment for people who become infected with covid, and since the vaccine is available to anyone who wants it, why should the insurance company pay for someone's medical treatment if they refuse the vaccine and then become infected. It's a preventable illness and so what if the insurance companies refused to pay? People would still get the treatment, they'd just have to pay for it themselves. Can you imagine that happening? It's simply the logical consequence of their own behavior.
I know several people who have become DEATHLY ill after taking the vaccine. So shouldn't the reverse be true? If you take a non-FDA approved vaccine and then become sick, shouldn't they refuse to pay for your medical treatment? I mean, you took a risky unapproved vaccine that hasn't been out for long, and the illness it was totally preventable - all you had to do was refuse this experiment, and yet you took it anyway.
TESU BSBA/HR 2018 - WVNCC BOG AAS 2017 - GGU Cert in Mgmt 2000
EXAMS: TECEP Tech Wrtg, Comp II, LA Math, PR, Computers DSST Computers, Pers Fin CLEP Mgmt, Mktg
COURSES: TESU Capstone Study.com Pers Fin, Microecon, Stats Ed4Credit Acct 2 PF Fin Mgmt ALEKS Int & Coll Alg Sophia Proj Mgmt The Institutes - Ins Ethics Kaplan PLA
•
Posts: 7,593
Threads: 87
Likes Received: 3,082 in 2,223 posts
Likes Given: 3,719
Joined: May 2020
(08-03-2021, 01:34 PM)Alpha Wrote: People have the right to vote and they have the right to refuse medical treatment. Eliminating either one of these would create far more problems than it would solve. But how about this...since we know that the vaccine eliminates costly medical treatment for people who become infected with covid, and since the vaccine is available to anyone who wants it, why should the insurance company pay for someone's medical treatment if they refuse the vaccine and then become infected. It's a preventable illness and so what if the insurance companies refused to pay? People would still get the treatment, they'd just have to pay for it themselves. Can you imagine that happening? It's simply the logical consequence of their own behavior.
One of my friends now has 2 heart conditions from the first dose of the vaccine. She's been battling these 2 conditions now for months and is having new complications every week.
In my county there were 8 positive cases on Monday. 2 of them were fully vaccinated. One of the vaccinated cases is symptomatic.
What about those who have illnesses or auto immune diseases? There have not been trials done on many diseases to see how the vaccine will impact those folks.
It's hardly as cut and dry as you make you it appear.
•
Posts: 1,340
Threads: 388
Likes Received: 493 in 343 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2021
08-03-2021, 03:44 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-03-2021, 04:06 PM by Alpha.)
(08-03-2021, 02:16 PM)ss20ts Wrote: (08-03-2021, 01:34 PM)Alpha Wrote: People have the right to vote and they have the right to refuse medical treatment. Eliminating either one of these would create far more problems than it would solve. But how about this...since we know that the vaccine eliminates costly medical treatment for people who become infected with covid, and since the vaccine is available to anyone who wants it, why should the insurance company pay for someone's medical treatment if they refuse the vaccine and then become infected. It's a preventable illness and so what if the insurance companies refused to pay? People would still get the treatment, they'd just have to pay for it themselves. Can you imagine that happening? It's simply the logical consequence of their own behavior.
One of my friends now has 2 heart conditions from the first dose of the vaccine. She's been battling these 2 conditions now for months and is having new complications every week.
In my county there were 8 positive cases on Monday. 2 of them were fully vaccinated. One of the vaccinated cases is symptomatic.
What about those who have illnesses or auto immune diseases? There have not been trials done on many diseases to see how
[quote pid='343454' dateline='1628018170']
It's hardly as cut and dry as you make you it appear.
I'm not "making it appear" like anything. I simply asked a hypothetical question in response to another hypothetical question. Clearly in such a scenario there would be exceptions, pre-existing conditions, etc. You could ask the same question in regards to smoking, for example. Everyone knows it's unhealthy to smoke. Why should my insurance premium go up simply because someone else won't quit. The op asked a hypothetical question and yet you didn't object to that. Why so sensitive when it comes to money?
[/quote]
So, continuing with the hypotheticals, we could easily say that, hypothetically, the individual would only need a letter from their doctor saying they were exempt from the vaccine. Others who have no such pre-existing conditions can pay. How's that?
•
Posts: 16,325
Threads: 148
Likes Received: 5,478 in 3,748 posts
Likes Given: 367
Joined: Apr 2013
(08-03-2021, 03:44 PM)Alpha Wrote: (08-03-2021, 02:16 PM)ss20ts Wrote: (08-03-2021, 01:34 PM)Alpha Wrote: People have the right to vote and they have the right to refuse medical treatment. Eliminating either one of these would create far more problems than it would solve. But how about this...since we know that the vaccine eliminates costly medical treatment for people who become infected with covid, and since the vaccine is available to anyone who wants it, why should the insurance company pay for someone's medical treatment if they refuse the vaccine and then become infected. It's a preventable illness and so what if the insurance companies refused to pay? People would still get the treatment, they'd just have to pay for it themselves. Can you imagine that happening? It's simply the logical consequence of their own behavior.
One of my friends now has 2 heart conditions from the first dose of the vaccine. She's been battling these 2 conditions now for months and is having new complications every week.
In my county there were 8 positive cases on Monday. 2 of them were fully vaccinated. One of the vaccinated cases is symptomatic.
What about those who have illnesses or auto immune diseases? There have not been trials done on many diseases to see how
[quote pid='343454' dateline='1628018170']
It's hardly as cut and dry as you make you it appear.
I'm not "making it appear" like anything. I simply asked a hypothetical question in response to another hypothetical question. Clearly in such a scenario there would be exceptions, pre-existing conditions, etc. You could ask the same question in regards to smoking, for example. Everyone knows it's unhealthy to smoke. Why should my insurance premium go up simply because someone else won't quit. The op asked a hypothetical question and yet you didn't object to that. Why so sensitive when it comes to money?
So, continuing with the hypotheticals, we could easily say that, hypothetically, the individual would only need a letter from their doctor saying they were exempt from the vaccine. Others who have no such pre-existing conditions can pay. How's that?
[/quote]
So I notice you didn't respond to me or ss20ts' statements about getting sick from the vaccine. Interesting.
TESU BSBA/HR 2018 - WVNCC BOG AAS 2017 - GGU Cert in Mgmt 2000
EXAMS: TECEP Tech Wrtg, Comp II, LA Math, PR, Computers DSST Computers, Pers Fin CLEP Mgmt, Mktg
COURSES: TESU Capstone Study.com Pers Fin, Microecon, Stats Ed4Credit Acct 2 PF Fin Mgmt ALEKS Int & Coll Alg Sophia Proj Mgmt The Institutes - Ins Ethics Kaplan PLA
•
Posts: 1,340
Threads: 388
Likes Received: 493 in 343 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2021
(08-03-2021, 04:32 PM)dfrecore Wrote: (08-03-2021, 03:44 PM)Alpha Wrote: (08-03-2021, 02:16 PM)ss20ts Wrote: (08-03-2021, 01:34 PM)Alpha Wrote: People have the right to vote and they have the right to refuse medical treatment. Eliminating either one of these would create far more problems than it would solve. But how about this...since we know that the vaccine eliminates costly medical treatment for people who become infected with covid, and since the vaccine is available to anyone who wants it, why should the insurance company pay for someone's medical treatment if they refuse the vaccine and then become infected. It's a preventable illness and so what if the insurance companies refused to pay? People would still get the treatment, they'd just have to pay for it themselves. Can you imagine that happening? It's simply the logical consequence of their own behavior.
One of my friends now has 2 heart conditions from the first dose of the vaccine. She's been battling these 2 conditions now for months and is having new complications every week.
In my county there were 8 positive cases on Monday. 2 of them were fully vaccinated. One of the vaccinated cases is symptomatic.
What about those who have illnesses or auto immune diseases? There have not been trials done on many diseases to see how
[quote pid='343454' dateline='1628018170']
It's hardly as cut and dry as you make you it appear.
I'm not "making it appear" like anything. I simply asked a hypothetical question in response to another hypothetical question. Clearly in such a scenario there would be exceptions, pre-existing conditions, etc. You could ask the same question in regards to smoking, for example. Everyone knows it's unhealthy to smoke. Why should my insurance premium go up simply because someone else won't quit. The op asked a hypothetical question and yet you didn't object to that. Why so sensitive when it comes to money?
So, continuing with the hypotheticals, we could easily say that, hypothetically, the individual would only need a letter from their doctor saying they were exempt from the vaccine. Others who have no such pre-existing conditions can pay. How's that?
So I notice you didn't respond to me or ss20ts' statements about getting sick from the vaccine. Interesting.
[/quote]
What do you find interesting about it? Some people have allegedly gotten sick from the vaccine. What's your point?
•
|
