Posts: 20,174
Threads: 1,008
Likes Received: 6,740 in 5,088 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Feb 2016
No, I am not referring to your dissertation or thesis. Would you or would you not shoot yourself in the foot by defending an employee that's working really well with the team or is a high-performance member in your team?
I just came across this article, there are many other corporations that operate with similar performance improvement programs, some of them are just to kick out the employee... I've never put myself in this situation before, hmm, I do wonder sometimes what I would do...
Link:
I was a manager at Amazon. My boss encouraged me to quit after I defended a high-performing employee who was about to get the lowest performance rating. (msn.com)
Study.com Offer
https://bit.ly/3RTJ3I9
Pre-Med Online, MSc Biomedical Sciences (Starting Jan 2026)
In Progress:
UoPeople BS Health Science
Completed:
UMPI BAS & MAOL (2025)
TESU ASNSM Biology, BSBA (ACBSP Accredited 2017)
•
Posts: 4,354
Threads: 31
Likes Received: 1,889 in 1,256 posts
Likes Given: 916
Joined: Dec 2015
I shouldn't be surprised, but that's F'd up. Well managed teams don't have really bad performers, especially if they've been running for a few years. Sure, I'd stick up for my guy. I'd rather leave than stay in such a toxic culture.
NanoDegree: Intro to Self-Driving Cars (2019)
Coursera: Stanford Machine Learning (2019)
TESU: BA in Comp Sci (2016)
TECEP:Env Ethics (2015); TESU PLA:Software Eng, Computer Arch, C++, Advanced C++, Data Struct (2015); TESU Courses:Capstone, Database Mngmnt Sys, Op Sys, Artificial Intel, Discrete Math, Intro to Portfolio Dev, Intro PLA (2014-16); DSST:Anthro, Pers Fin, Astronomy (2014); CLEP:Intro to Soc (2014); Saylor.org:Intro to Computers (2014); CC: 69 units (1980-88)
PLA Tips Thread - TESU: What is in a Portfolio?
•
Posts: 1,340
Threads: 388
Likes Received: 494 in 343 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2021
I agree with Dave. And as an aside, I've heard very few good things (and lots of bad things) about working for Amazon.
•
Posts: 16,325
Threads: 148
Likes Received: 5,482 in 3,748 posts
Likes Given: 367
Joined: Apr 2013
I'm all for getting rid of losers - way too many of them drag the team/branch/company down. But forcing people to arbitrarily put people in the bottom percentile is just dumb. Sometimes, a team is just filled with great people - especially after you spend a couple of years culling the bad ones. At some point, a team COULD have all great employees, and I mean, isn't that the goal? If you get rid of a good (or great) person because you have to, and then hire someone new to replace them, what did you gain? At best, you get another great person, creating the same problem next year. At worst, you get a crappy person, who you are then just going to get rid of at year's end.
This really makes no sense.
TESU BSBA/HR 2018 - WVNCC BOG AAS 2017 - GGU Cert in Mgmt 2000
EXAMS: TECEP Tech Wrtg, Comp II, LA Math, PR, Computers DSST Computers, Pers Fin CLEP Mgmt, Mktg
COURSES: TESU Capstone Study.com Pers Fin, Microecon, Stats Ed4Credit Acct 2 PF Fin Mgmt ALEKS Int & Coll Alg Sophia Proj Mgmt The Institutes - Ins Ethics Kaplan PLA
•
Posts: 1,106
Threads: 42
Likes Received: 356 in 240 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jun 2020
02-21-2023, 01:57 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-21-2023, 02:20 PM by Pats20.)
Unfortunately the corporate mentality is “what have you done for me lately” nobody cares about yesterday, unless it was bad, then you’re held responsible.
The management style that is being practiced today by a lot of companies is a micromanaged run and gun style to keep everyone covered up and to prevent free reign and thought.
You keep teams hopping and changing , you prevent comfort, enjoyment, and sense of security.
•