(07-13-2020, 08:22 AM)SteveFoerster Wrote:(07-12-2020, 01:19 PM)dfrecore Wrote: I don't think their main goal is to make things easy for Alt-credit users, because I don't think it's a very large percentage of their students. MOST students at any school are starting from scratch or bringing in credits from other schools. We are the outliers here, and are a tiny fraction of who they normally deal with.
Exactly right. I don't know anyone on the Alumni board who did as much non-traditional credit as a lot of the people on this forum, and those in Charter Oak's administration were focused on the revenue needed for sustainability even before the pandemic... and 114'ers don't bring much.
Sure. They need the money for the operations. But then don't try to provide some lofty justifications for the whole thing. It's only so many credits, and everyone already has them. No, it's a money grab. It's a whole year of excluded credit and potentially more with specific ACE credit rejections. They just couldn't care less about non-trad students and their study tracks. In the future, they might even throw them under the bus without looking back at their big three commitment.