03-26-2022, 05:35 PM
Its a good article with good points but the problem is this:
"The best technology will never replace great educators;"
I went to a really solid HS but frankly I'd say like there were less than 10% of my teachers who really great. They tried to inspire or encourage learning. For most it seems like a 9-5 job and I can't blame them. I'd assume that that is sort of a normal distribution - I just completed Principles of Stat
If thats the case is it worth doing b&m for the 10% probabillity u run into greatness? Maybe 4 some. But not $150K worth/ Which is what it would cost for me.
"The best technology will never replace great educators;"
I went to a really solid HS but frankly I'd say like there were less than 10% of my teachers who really great. They tried to inspire or encourage learning. For most it seems like a 9-5 job and I can't blame them. I'd assume that that is sort of a normal distribution - I just completed Principles of Stat
If thats the case is it worth doing b&m for the 10% probabillity u run into greatness? Maybe 4 some. But not $150K worth/ Which is what it would cost for me.
![[-]](https://www.degreeforum.net/mybb/images/collapse.png)