European International University

[Sagan]

"Thanks for your input. According to your logic, a Royal Charter university without additional accreditation would also be "inferior," which is demonstrably false. Unless you're prepared to argue that your own UK degree is inferior by your own standard, your position is internally inconsistent."

This is a strawman argument. I neither said nor inferred any such thing. I said nothing about "additional accreditation," nor anything like it. This is disingenous.

"At this point, however, we're simply repeating ourselves rather than advancing the discussion."

Yes, that happens a lot when unaccredited schools are shilled. But that's okay. It's necessary so people less informed about these matters are not fooled into making a bad choice.

Unless I missed something, one NACES member--IEE--evaluated the ACBSP-accredited degrees successfully. But if you cannot use IEE, or if you do a program not covered by the ACBSP accreditation, you're out of luck.

"Sagan considers EIU to be substandard...."

No, not really. But its degrees are. That's not my opinion; that's an observable fact.

---

"US Equivalency:
Bachelor of Business Administration Degree, Finance"

End of story.

By whom? Whose conclusion are you describing?