European International University

[PearsonOTHMQualifi7654]

---

"US Equivalency:
Bachelor of Business Administration Degree, Finance"

End of story.

By whom? Whose conclusion are you describing?

He's referencing an IEE evaluation for the non-ACBSP BBA which seems to be getting overlooked.

My point is that just about any institution can be scrutinized and criticized depending on the criteria one chooses to emphasize. 

I don't consider my own Royal Charter degrees to be substandard, but someone else is certainly entitled to that opinion. 

My point is simply that objective facts and subjective judgments are two different things.

Regarding the IEE evaluation that keeps being referenced, I think there's still a misunderstanding.

The IEE evaluation I uploaded was not for the ACBSP-accredited BBA. I did not enroll in EIU's ACBSP-accredited program. I completed the non-ACBSP EIU-Paris BBA, and that is the degree I submitted to IEE for evaluation. I've shared the evaluation multiple times because this distinction continues to be overlooked.

My point isn't that everyone has to agree EIU is a great institution. Rather, it's that terms like "substandard" and "inferior" are evaluative judgments that depend on the criteria being applied. 

In this thread, you've described EIU degrees as "substandard." In another discussion, you described títulos propios as "inferior."

The underlying institutional facts may be objective, but concluding that a credential is therefore "substandard" or "inferior" is still an evaluative judgment.