Posts: 5,078
Threads: 551
Likes Received: 3,036 in 1,969 posts
Likes Given: 1,886
Joined: Jun 2018
Study.com – Get 10% Off: https://altcredit.click/study10
Degrees: BA Comp Sci; BS Business Admin (CIS); AS Nat Sci & Math — TESU (4.0 GPA)
Certs: Google (IT Support, Digital Marketing, Proj Mgmt); W3Schools PHP
•
Posts: 874
Threads: 28
Likes Received: 794 in 426 posts
Likes Given: 1,106
Joined: Dec 2023
05-31-2026, 08:22 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-31-2026, 08:23 PM by NotJoeBiden.)
Does most of these not also apply to all learning in general?
Posts: 5,078
Threads: 551
Likes Received: 3,036 in 1,969 posts
Likes Given: 1,886
Joined: Jun 2018
(05-31-2026, 08:22 PM)NotJoeBiden Wrote: Does most of these not also apply to all learning in general?
True you could apply lots of those concepts to all learning. Using AI accelerates the time it takes to do those things.
Study.com – Get 10% Off: https://altcredit.click/study10
Degrees: BA Comp Sci; BS Business Admin (CIS); AS Nat Sci & Math — TESU (4.0 GPA)
Certs: Google (IT Support, Digital Marketing, Proj Mgmt); W3Schools PHP
•
Posts: 1
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jun 2026
Can AI improve learning more than traditional methods?
•
Posts: 661
Threads: 36
Likes Received: 428 in 277 posts
Likes Given: 317
Joined: Aug 2023
(06-26-2026, 10:07 PM)Havern Wrote: Can AI improve learning more than traditional methods?
I believe it can, especially given that it can be a personalized coach and it can help simplify an answer to your liking and from there, you can compound more knowledge. I am a fan of the Feynman Technique in learning, where you learn about a topic and then you explain the topic in your own words, identify your knowledge gap(s) and circle back. AI can be a great tool for helping you understand complex information, before, it was Wikipedia.
TESU
2026: Doctor of Business Admin
UIUC
2026: MS Management
WPUNJ
2027: MS Finance
2024: M.Ed - Educational Leadership
2026: B.S Information Technology
CCAF:
2024: A.A.S - Emergency Management
UMPI:
2024: M.A.O.L
2024: BABA - PM/IS
2023: B.A. - His & Poli Sci
2023: B.L.S. - Mgmt
2023: A.A. - LS
RCSJ:
2022: A.A.A.S. - Soc
2023: A.A.A.S. - His
2023: A.A.A.S. - Phil
2023: A.A.A.S. - Psy
Posts: 950
Threads: 14
Likes Received: 851 in 454 posts
Likes Given: 631
Joined: Aug 2014
(06-01-2026, 05:20 PM)LevelUP Wrote: (05-31-2026, 08:22 PM)NotJoeBiden Wrote: Does most of these not also apply to all learning in general?
True you could apply lots of those concepts to all learning. Using AI accelerates the time it takes to do those things.
Citation needed, to put it mildly. It seems more likely that students using LLMs to generate papers and answer questions on tests is subverting all the things below the waterline, not improving them.
I'm not saying that LLMs can't be used positively by institutions and by students, but I question how much of what's happening now is at all positive.
BS, Information Systems concentration, Charter Oak State College
MA in Educational Technology Leadership, George Washington University
EdD in Professional Studies, Thomas Edison State University, in progress
Let's connect! https://linkedin.com/in/stevefoerster
•
Posts: 874
Threads: 28
Likes Received: 794 in 426 posts
Likes Given: 1,106
Joined: Dec 2023
06-29-2026, 08:38 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-29-2026, 08:38 PM by NotJoeBiden.)
(06-26-2026, 11:08 PM)Mint Berry Crunch Wrote: (06-26-2026, 10:07 PM)Havern Wrote: Can AI improve learning more than traditional methods?
I believe it can, especially given that it can be a personalized coach and it can help simplify an answer to your liking and from there, you can compound more knowledge. I am a fan of the Feynman Technique in learning, where you learn about a topic and then you explain the topic in your own words, identify your knowledge gap(s) and circle back. AI can be a great tool for helping you understand complex information, before, it was Wikipedia.
I will say, Wikipedia does a good job to make sure the information is right. AI does not have those safeguards.
Right now, AI hallucinates as much as 30% of responses. I have yet to have interacted with anything or anyone who hallucinates that much, including some chemistry faculty were known to develop their own drugs back in the day (and might still be).
|