HawkGuy Wrote:Ok, so I had this fun idea of starting a new college similar to the Big 3, with no residency, accepting CLEPS and DANTES tests for the whole degree, FEMA straight from the source, etc.. but with less fees than EC and TESC. You know, all the goods but less of the bads haha.
While doing my research, I was looking at the DETC Accreditation Handbook and their requirements. One requirement is that the school seeking accreditation must have at least 2 years continuous operations.
My question is: why would anyone sign up at an unaccredited school?
Any and all feedback would be appreciated!!
EDIT- what they heck? LOL sorry to bring this thread back from the dead, my mistake!
Really? (what kind of college?)
Anyway, well, people sign up for unaccredited schools all the time because it meets a need. Take something I know about- culinary. If you have a few big name chefs on the teaching staff, that IS what you are there for- no one gives a crap about the accreditation. (certainly not other chefs) Consider cosmetology, or other trade occupations....college used to be a different option. It used to be either/or. It's only more recently- like within the past 25 years or so, that trade occupations and apprenticeships have been "professionalizing" their fields by tacking on or tracking into degrees and certificates. It's about acquiring the skills not the credits. If Ace of Cakes opened up a "cakeology" degree out of the back room, there would be a waiting list. These people act with informed consent - no harm no foul. I have seen plenty of NON-CREDIT professional development/continuing ed programs that cost more than my bachelor's degree. So, people do pay for information that they want- with or without RA/NA being attached.
Also, religious colleges are notoriously unaccredited. Religious people rarely care. I hope that doesn't sound offensive, because I don't mean it as a negative- rather as a fact. People who are deeply committed to their religion as a world view, want a college education that jives with and advances their beliefs. Man's accreditation standards are pretty far down on the list of what matters. This may be less true with mainstream, large, denominations. Significantly true with some denominations.
Then, there are those who are uninformed. There are always people who will sign up for something without doing their homework. That doesn't mean they are being scammed....because unaccredited schools are not necessarily scams- nor are they illegal. But, this group might think they are getting one thing while they are actually getting something else. Like in the issue of RA vs NA, if you don't understand the difference you might be in trouble...but for others, it's irrelevant. Really, no difference.
Then there is the group that wants a quick degree. Assuming the unaccredited school is equal to a diploma mill, these people know full well what they are buying and are doing so with the intent of representing themselves as degree holders.
Clearly, if someone wanted a degree in liberal arts, transfer credit, etc., they would not attend an unaccredited college. Even if/when the school gains accreditation, a graduate's credits are not retroactive. I know this because I spent a great deal of effort trying to get my 1990 credits counted as RA (the college's current accreditation) despite their NA accreditation during my dates of attendance. No retro-activity- no exceptions.