deleted......................
Not saying this as an attack: I hope the board can get an upgrade at some point to change the way quoting works. I just had a 3-tiered quote and lost the entire thing when I hit send, because somehow the system decided not to post it and somehow reverted to an older version that I had already removed. I'd love if this whole thing just worked the way it does at places like DegreeInfo where it's seamless and neat.
Not meant as an attack of any sort, I just want to be able to post a thorough reply to some things without it looking like a mess of quotes or without it not posting correctly like what I just described.
I'd also love for it to no longer combine posts into one like this. Each post should be separate, never combined. The combining only adds to the mess.
JPN: That isn't what was asked by WES, but rather the titulo itself or the letter of award needed to be sent by the Universidad. I am sure ENEB can send the transcript directly (do you think they typically only send paper transcripts to WES?). Without having done the evaluation myself, I can't really speak for the process. It could also be that this is a relatively new requirement imposed.
The third badge that I listed was issued in November 2022, so I think you may be right though.
Given its setup, I'm sure ENEB sends the majority of its documents electronically, it's just that Isabel won't send anything for any of the propio programs they oversee. I seem to recall a point during the whole ordeal beginning in 2020 when WES was accepting documents electronically as pretty much all evaluators were. I'm not 100% sure though and could be confusing them with other agencies. Someone who has had an evaluation in the past 2+ years or so with them might chime in to shed light on that.
JPN: WES US evaluates for equivalency to US degrees. WES Canada evaluates for equivalency to Canadian degrees.
Yes, that part is obvious. But what I was getting at speaks to a central stance on certain types of degrees and/or certain schools. There are programs that neither the U.S. nor Canadian units of WES will even accept for evaluation. I imagine that isn't a mere coincidence and is the result of information being shared between the two.
JPN: I also imagine petitioning WES USA over it is more likely to just kill the equivalency for WES Canada and ruin it for everyone.
If that were to happen, WES shouldn't be in business anymore. That wouldn't be a rational, professional way to handle a situation and would show WES as a detriment to the field and to many applicants besides ENEB students.
A challenge to an evaluation position should never trigger a punishment-style action in response.
Although there has been a push to build it, Canada doesn't have a formal accreditation structure like the U.S. has where students would expect schools to be accredited by specific recognized accreditors. As I understand it, in Canada these things are handled by government but in a more QA-like manner.
With regard to your second block, if it's only kept to badges a person may get by. But once documents are asked for (and they could be), and it reveals that it's an evaluation meant for Canada, the deck of cards will fall. Or, the people viewing the docs may just say "good enough", that could happen as well. I wouldn't risk it myself though.
Not saying this as an attack: I hope the board can get an upgrade at some point to change the way quoting works. I just had a 3-tiered quote and lost the entire thing when I hit send, because somehow the system decided not to post it and somehow reverted to an older version that I had already removed. I'd love if this whole thing just worked the way it does at places like DegreeInfo where it's seamless and neat.
Not meant as an attack of any sort, I just want to be able to post a thorough reply to some things without it looking like a mess of quotes or without it not posting correctly like what I just described.
I'd also love for it to no longer combine posts into one like this. Each post should be separate, never combined. The combining only adds to the mess.
JPN: That isn't what was asked by WES, but rather the titulo itself or the letter of award needed to be sent by the Universidad. I am sure ENEB can send the transcript directly (do you think they typically only send paper transcripts to WES?). Without having done the evaluation myself, I can't really speak for the process. It could also be that this is a relatively new requirement imposed.
The third badge that I listed was issued in November 2022, so I think you may be right though.
Given its setup, I'm sure ENEB sends the majority of its documents electronically, it's just that Isabel won't send anything for any of the propio programs they oversee. I seem to recall a point during the whole ordeal beginning in 2020 when WES was accepting documents electronically as pretty much all evaluators were. I'm not 100% sure though and could be confusing them with other agencies. Someone who has had an evaluation in the past 2+ years or so with them might chime in to shed light on that.
JPN: WES US evaluates for equivalency to US degrees. WES Canada evaluates for equivalency to Canadian degrees.
Yes, that part is obvious. But what I was getting at speaks to a central stance on certain types of degrees and/or certain schools. There are programs that neither the U.S. nor Canadian units of WES will even accept for evaluation. I imagine that isn't a mere coincidence and is the result of information being shared between the two.
JPN: I also imagine petitioning WES USA over it is more likely to just kill the equivalency for WES Canada and ruin it for everyone.
If that were to happen, WES shouldn't be in business anymore. That wouldn't be a rational, professional way to handle a situation and would show WES as a detriment to the field and to many applicants besides ENEB students.
A challenge to an evaluation position should never trigger a punishment-style action in response.
(01-05-2023, 03:46 AM)Silvious Wrote: I suppose it's because there is just no such thing as an unaccredited university in Canada; a master's degree is just a master's degree up North.
If you remove the &type=ca in the badge link, it'll have the US header, but in the details still list Canada equivalent. It may be worth it to get it evaluated for Canada and just use the badge without the ending if you live in the US.
Although there has been a push to build it, Canada doesn't have a formal accreditation structure like the U.S. has where students would expect schools to be accredited by specific recognized accreditors. As I understand it, in Canada these things are handled by government but in a more QA-like manner.
With regard to your second block, if it's only kept to badges a person may get by. But once documents are asked for (and they could be), and it reveals that it's an evaluation meant for Canada, the deck of cards will fall. Or, the people viewing the docs may just say "good enough", that could happen as well. I wouldn't risk it myself though.
![[-]](https://www.degreeforum.net/mybb/images/collapse.png)