Woolf University - Educational Partnership & Institutions

[Maltus]

I paid little attention when founder was talking about software, only remember it being used for record keeping at very granular level (even quizz results?), and for any changes to learning materials for accreditation purposes.

Regarding validation through RPL...to me students are students of Woolf, Woolf makes admission, they study at a way too independent college but they study Woolf program effectively. And while they technically study at platform of another institution, it is effectively Woolf material and could be to some extent under Woolf management technically (eg. in terms of student progress being tracked by Woolf, which might be translated to tests done by Woolf even if displayed on another platform - though that part I am not sure about, I could have misunderstood the details or whether it is a fact or just a possibility with their software).

Woolf is making advances, but so is MFHEA in toughening whole system.
We will see in April.
(Not an excuse for them, but while they got "requires improvement" for eight standards, there was no "doesn't meet the standard" - which is what I read on reports of other institutions and believe might be a level below "requires improvement").

I am a bit worried seeing SHS Studienzentrum Hohe Warte as one of their new colleges.

Well on page 8 of the auditreport the auditors state, that Woolf only meets 3 of 8 standards, which implies they missed the others. What also bugs me, is that woolf in no standard seems to be above average: No best practice in any point.

What's the problem with SHS? Do you know anything concrete? I mean they are from Austria and obviously they can't make it to get the Status for Privatuniversität, which many Institutes have who offer CE-Masters (which are not in the European System and so not equal to Masters from other countries). So there might be a problem with the quality