Posts: 757
Threads: 5
Likes Received: 355 in 230 posts
Likes Given: 250
Joined: Feb 2012
06-30-2025, 03:54 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-30-2025, 04:01 PM by eLearner.)
(06-30-2025, 07:33 AM)lillingworth Wrote:
(06-26-2025, 04:14 PM)lillingworth Wrote: I tried to add an attachment to my reply showing my results. Are you able to see it?
I sent the diploma from UI1, which combines the two master's on one certificate. It contains a signature and seal, so not sure why you're saying it's not valid. It's enough for immigration and work, so again, not sure why you're saying it's invalid. If you don't want to use validential, then don't, but please don't say it's not valid. The diploma lists both, and as long as I include the diploma and the eval, I don't see an issue. My degree is valid.
Relax. I didn't say anything about the degree(s) not being valid. I spoke only about the evaluation. It's abnormal for two Master's degrees to be on one evaluation. If the school is putting two degree programs on one diploma that too is odd from a North American standpoint at least because it's two separate degrees.
(06-29-2025, 04:48 PM)huiwh1998 Wrote: I think the guy who did the Josef Silny & Associates, Inc. (JS&A) evaluation, evaluating as a Master's degree (not regionally accredited), should ask them for more clarification. Ask them what "not regionally accredited" means, be more specific about it, as a National Accredited master's degree would also be quite useful in the job market...Accredited is Accredited, no matter how bad the Accrediter be...
Evaluators only evaluate for RA. They don't evaluate for NA. So when your degree is recognized as a Masters but not regionally accredited, that means it's equivalent to an unaccredited Master's degree in the United States.
•