Posts: 98
Threads: 13
Likes Received: 9 in 9 posts
Likes Given: 4
Joined: Mar 2023
Has anyone tried recognizing ENEB/UC1 or UoPeople degrees in Australia?
It seems like you need to use https://www.vetassess.com.au/ for immigration purposes. But a thousand dollars is really a lot.
As far as I know, vetassess might have some kind of partnership with enic/naric from Europe. And might so similar assessments, so if enic/naric in Europe/UK evaluate favorably, that vetassess should do so too. I have no idea if it makes sense.
•
Posts: 22
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 1 in 1 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2023
Bump.
Also interested to know.
•
Posts: 4,263
Threads: 31
Likes Received: 1,784 in 1,192 posts
Likes Given: 886
Joined: Dec 2015
UofPeople ought to be ok since it's properly accredited in the U.S. (recognized by the DOE). However, everything needs verification.
NanoDegree: Intro to Self-Driving Cars (2019)
Coursera: Stanford Machine Learning (2019)
TESU: BA in Comp Sci (2016)
TECEP:Env Ethics (2015); TESU PLA:Software Eng, Computer Arch, C++, Advanced C++, Data Struct (2015); TESU Courses:Capstone, Database Mngmnt Sys, Op Sys, Artificial Intel, Discrete Math, Intro to Portfolio Dev, Intro PLA (2014-16); DSST:Anthro, Pers Fin, Astronomy (2014); CLEP:Intro to Soc (2014); Saylor.org:Intro to Computers (2014); CC: 69 units (1980-88)
PLA Tips Thread - TESU: What is in a Portfolio?
•
Posts: 8,316
Threads: 91
Likes Received: 3,461 in 2,482 posts
Likes Given: 4,093
Joined: May 2020
(03-24-2024, 10:27 AM)davewill Wrote: UofPeople ought to be ok since it's properly accredited in the U.S. (recognized by the DOE). However, everything needs verification.
It is NA and not RA which may be an issue for some. RA is still the requirement for many things in life.
Posts: 18,165
Threads: 968
Likes Received: 5,983 in 4,506 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Feb 2016
Australia and New Zealand follow through with the ENIC/NARIC evaluations as I mentioned on this thread here, they'll go through as long as one or more ENIC/NARIC affiliates will accept them accordingly: https://www.degreeforum.net/mybb/Thread-...NEB-Isabel
Posts: 321
Threads: 9
Likes Received: 145 in 94 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2023
03-31-2024, 01:21 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-31-2024, 01:35 PM by nykorn.)
(03-24-2024, 10:27 AM)davewill Wrote: UofPeople ought to be ok since it's properly accredited in the U.S. (recognized by the DOE). However, everything needs verification.
Not necessarily. It depends on if the country wants the school to be accredited on a state-wide basis, or if a national basis is ok. UoPeople is registered in California but not accredited in California's eyes and not eligible for state licensing purposes in Cali (for example, their Education Master's can't be used towards a public school teacher license in California), because California itself doesn't accept DEAC accreditation - afaik this is the main basis for Canada not accepting UoPeople for immigration, as on the individual state level UoPeople is unaccredited. However UoPeople is accredited on a nation-wide basis as many other states, such as Washington, accept DEAC accreditation for state licensing purposes (that same UoPeople degree can get you a Washington state public school teacher license).
So any country which uses "all of America" as the basis for its immigration decisions would accept UoPeople, but any country that considers each state to be more like its own country would not accept UoPeople. This is SEPARATE from "regional accreditation" - DEAC is not a regional accreditor, and as an example is not accepted by all Washington schools for admissions, but is still accepted for Washington state licensing purposes. Usually if you can get a state license (restricted to only people holding a degree) from the degree it means it is 100% accredited, and that list of accreditors is often on the state Board of Education and Board of Licensing websites - it is stuff like that which immigration may look at. Unfortunately you have no idea about the inner workings of some country's immigration office (if they choose a "per state" or "per country" stance) unless someone applies and reports the decision back.
•
Posts: 98
Threads: 13
Likes Received: 9 in 9 posts
Likes Given: 4
Joined: Mar 2023
(03-25-2024, 09:06 PM)bjcheung77 Wrote: Australia and New Zealand follow through with the ENIC/NARIC evaluations as I mentioned on this thread here, they'll go through as long as one or more ENIC/NARIC affiliates will accept them accordingly: https://www.degreeforum.net/mybb/Thread-...NEB-Isabel
If they follow ENIC/NARIC evaluations, who would ENIC/NARIC evaluate more favourably, ENEBs master or UoPeople BS CS?
•
Posts: 98
Threads: 13
Likes Received: 9 in 9 posts
Likes Given: 4
Joined: Mar 2023
I found this thread which talks about that. Do you know if this still works since the whole ENEBE WES drama from this winter?
And for Australia immigration, it seems like you can only use vetassess for the assessment, but Vetassess might have a partnership with ENIC/NARIC, so, it might just be enough...
•
Posts: 98
Threads: 13
Likes Received: 9 in 9 posts
Likes Given: 4
Joined: Mar 2023
04-16-2024, 11:38 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-16-2024, 11:46 AM by ecdw94.)
It seems like I Forgot to post a link, for whatever I found.
But, if you have an IT profession and you did a bachelor of science in computer science degree, you can not be accessed by vetassess, but you have to be assessed by Australian Computer Society (ACT) .
•
Posts: 18,165
Threads: 968
Likes Received: 5,983 in 4,506 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Feb 2016
•
|