02-08-2008, 08:32 PM
This afternoon, at SMU -- scored 63. After I finished, the proctor said that, in 4 years of administering the Nat Sci test, she's had only a handful of people pass it. As a literature/history nerd with zero math skills and not much more in science, I'm really pleased. No more math or science standing between me and a BA!
Before I forget, here are a few of the topics covered:
As expected, some of the questions are just common sense. A few others seemed tailor-made for a language nerd: I could "divine" the answer by analyzing the words in the answer choices and thinking how they might relate to the question.
But without extensive study -- approximately 50 hours -- I would never have passed this thing. Here's what I used:
For 6 science credits, I recommend Nat Sci over Biology unless you've learned a lot of biology in your job. I compared the two, and Biology goes way too deep. The thing about Nat Sci is that, if you were paying attention in those Biology, Chemistry, and Physics classes you took in high school, you already have a nice platform on which to build for Nat Sci. But you won't have even 10% of the biology knowledge you would need to pass the Biology CLEP.
I hope this helps someone who needs 6 science credits. I want to give back, for all the benefit I've gained here!
Before I forget, here are a few of the topics covered:
- Chemical bonding, formulas and equations -- lots of it, mostly simple stuff
- Structure of atoms, and their masses and weights and isotopes -- know how to calculate based on various types of expressions
- Laws of motion -- Newton, Galileo
- Types of waves (light, sound, etc.)
- Conduction
- Classification of animals and plants
- Food chain
- What rocks are found where
- Genetics -- pedigrees and calculating probabilities
- Solar system and stars -- basics of what's going on with them
- Topographical maps
- Common diseases -- what they are, how they're spread
- Cell biology and mitosis
- Basic human anatomy and organ systems
- DNA, RNA, and proteins
- Earth's atmosphere
As expected, some of the questions are just common sense. A few others seemed tailor-made for a language nerd: I could "divine" the answer by analyzing the words in the answer choices and thinking how they might relate to the question.
But without extensive study -- approximately 50 hours -- I would never have passed this thing. Here's what I used:
- Life on Earth by Audesirk, Audesirk, & Byers (But read very selectively; it goes into way too much detail on most subjects. Keep the College Board's test outline firmly in mind)
- Standard Deviants Biology: Highly recommended for the cell, chemical bonding, DNA/RNA/proteins. But barely touches on genetics, which I could have used more of.
- Standard Deviants Chemistry I: Not as helpful as Biology, but still worth the money. Good for chemical equations and bonding
- REA 2008: Very well done, with drills at the end of each chapter that turned out to closely follow the test.
- Kaplan 2005: I used the practice tests from this, but found the reviews not well written enough to be helpful. They left me scratching my head.
- Wikipedia: Great for looking up most any topic, although the science articles are mostly written with the specialist in mind. Thank heaven for cross references.
For 6 science credits, I recommend Nat Sci over Biology unless you've learned a lot of biology in your job. I compared the two, and Biology goes way too deep. The thing about Nat Sci is that, if you were paying attention in those Biology, Chemistry, and Physics classes you took in high school, you already have a nice platform on which to build for Nat Sci. But you won't have even 10% of the biology knowledge you would need to pass the Biology CLEP.
I hope this helps someone who needs 6 science credits. I want to give back, for all the benefit I've gained here!